Professionals’ Perceptions: “Why is Lead Poisoning Prevalent in Lancaster County?”

Harriet Okatch, Margaret Cherney, Brittany Mokshefsky, Madeline Kuon, Sarah Scheuring, Emily Ritchey and Jiayi Chen
Additional contact information
Harriet Okatch: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA
Margaret Cherney: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA
Brittany Mokshefsky: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA
Madeline Kuon: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA
Sarah Scheuring: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA
Emily Ritchey: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA
Jiayi Chen: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 13, 1-10

Abstract: Background: The prevalence of lead poisoning in children under the age of six years living in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania continues to be greater than the state-wide prevalence for this age group. This study aims to determine the factors that contribute to the high lead poisoning rates. Methods: For this qualitative study, the researchers recruited a convenience sample of professionals providing healthcare and social welfare services in the county. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with participants. The research team audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed each interview using NVivo 12 software. Results: The 16 interviewed participants identified factors that contribute to high lead poisoning rates including knowledge levels, housing status, and competing interests. Specifically, low knowledge levels, renting as opposed to home ownership, and having competing interests seemed to minimize the attention directed towards preventing lead poisoning. The experts offered recommendations to address the high lead poisoning rates including increasing lead knowledge levels of both community members and landlords, through creating and distributing health promotion material, enacting policies to empower renters, and systematically collaborating to streamline lead poisoning related information and services. Conclusions: Findings provide insights to factors that Lancaster can address to achieve a decrease in lead poisoning rates. This study provides information that can be utilized by public health professionals to develop appropriate interventions.

Keywords: lead poisoning; in-depth interviews; knowledge levels; housing status; competing interests; Lancaster; professionals; children (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/13/2281/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/13/2281/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:13:p:2281-:d:243620

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().