The Mental Health Benefits of Purposeful Activities in Public Green Spaces in Urban and Semi-Urban Neighbourhoods: A Mixed-Methods Pilot and Proof of Concept Study
Peter A. Coventry,
Chris Neale,
Alison Dyke,
Rachel Pateman and
Steve Cinderby
Additional contact information
Peter A. Coventry: Department of Health Sciences and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
Chris Neale: Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
Alison Dyke: Stockholm Environment Institute, Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
Rachel Pateman: Stockholm Environment Institute, Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
Steve Cinderby: Stockholm Environment Institute, Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 15, 1-16
Abstract:
Access and exposure to public green space might be critical to health promotion and prevention of mental ill health. However, it is uncertain if differential health and mental health benefits are associated with undertaking different activities in public green space. We evaluated the health and wellbeing benefits of different activities in different locations of public green spaces in urban and semi-urban areas. We used a mixed-methods before-and-after design. Volunteers at three conservation sites were recruited and took part in group guided walks, practical conservation tasks or citizen science. Repeated measures one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni correction assessed the relationship between location and activity type on change in acute subjective mood from pre- to post-activity, measured with the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UWIST-MACL). Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken and analysed thematically to explore participants’ perceptions about the health and wellbeing benefits of activities in public green space. Forty-five participants were recruited, leading to 65 independent observations. Walking, conservation and citizen science in public green space were associated with improved mood. Across all participants acute subjective mood improved across all domains of the UWIST-MACL. There was a significant association between reduction in stress and location ( p = 0.009). Qualitatively participants reported that conservation and citizen science conferred co-benefits to the environment and individual health and well-being and were perceived as purposeful. Undertaking purposeful activity in public green space has the potential to promote health and prevent mental ill health.
Keywords: green space; mood; well-being; activity; location; urban (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/15/2712/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/15/2712/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:15:p:2712-:d:252846
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().