EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI)

Lilian Monteiro Ferrari Viterbo, Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, André Santana Costa and Diogo Guedes Vidal
Additional contact information
Lilian Monteiro Ferrari Viterbo: UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis: UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
André Santana Costa: Universidade Corporativa, Bahia 41745-002, Brazil
Diogo Guedes Vidal: UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 15, 1-17

Abstract: The present study aimed to develop and validate an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI). The development stage comprised a group of 10 professionals, including physicians, nurses, nutritionists, dentists and physical educators, as well as a judges’ committee, composed by 19 recognized experts in the area of worker’s health (WH). For the validation of the IWHAI, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient ( r s ) was calculated, the factor analysis to the instrument was applied, and the Cronbach’s alpha ( ? ) and the Intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC ) were calculated. The IWHAI was structured in five dimensions, integrating 43 health indicators, on a scale of 0–4, totalling 215 sub-indices with closed response coding. The instrument was validated with a Kappa coefficient (KAPPA) ( k ), with excellent agreement for all attributes, i.e., k = 0.88 for applicability, k = 0.80 for clarity and k = 0.82 for relevance. p > 0.05 results reveal moderate to strong positive correlations between some variables, i.e., pests, vectors and air quality/drinking water quality (r s = 0.69). A total of 14 components of the factor analysis, explaining 62.6% of the data variance, were extracted. ? value is considered moderate to high, ? = 0.61, the ICC value also being considered moderate to high, with ICC = 0.61. The IWHAI is considered validated, constituting a technological innovation for an interdisciplinary approach in the field of WH, enabling the prevention and integral promotion of health.

Keywords: worker’s health (WH); interdisciplinary approach; questionnaire; instrument validation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/15/2803/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/15/2803/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:15:p:2803-:d:255190

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:15:p:2803-:d:255190