Factors Associated with Practice-Level Performance Indicators in Primary Health Care in Hungary: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
Nóra Kovács,
Anita Pálinkás,
Valéria Sipos,
Attila Nagy,
Nouh Harsha,
László Kőrösi,
Magor Papp,
Róza Ádány,
Orsolya Varga and
János Sándor
Additional contact information
Nóra Kovács: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
Anita Pálinkás: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
Valéria Sipos: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
Attila Nagy: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
Nouh Harsha: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
László Kőrösi: Department of Financing, National Institute of Health Insurance Fund Management, 1139 Budapest, Hungary
Magor Papp: Health Promotion Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
Róza Ádány: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
Orsolya Varga: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
János Sándor: Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary
IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 17, 1-15
Abstract:
The performance of general practitioners (GPs) is frequently assessed without considering the factors causing variability among general medical practices (GMPs). Our cross-sectional national-based study was performed in Hungary to evaluate the influence of GMP characteristics on performance indicators. The relationship between patient’s characteristics (age, gender, education) and GMP-specific parameters (practice size, vacancy of GP’s position, settlement type, and county of GMP) and the quality of care was assessed by multilevel logistic regression models. The variations attributable to physicians were small (from 0.77% to 17.95%). The education of patients was associated with 10 performance indicators. Practicing in an urban settlement mostly increased the quality of care for hypertension and diabetes care related performance indicators, while the county was identified as one of the major determinants of variability among GPs’ performance. Only a few indicators were affected by the vacancy and practice size. Thus, the observed variability in performance between GPs partially arose from demographic characteristics and education of patients, settlement type, and regional location of GMPs. Considering the real effect of these factors in evaluation would reflect better the personal performance of GPs.
Keywords: general practitioner; primary healthcare; quality indicators; GMP; performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3153/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3153/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3153-:d:262051
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().