What Is the Experience of Practitioners in Health, Education or Social Care Roles Following a Death by Suicide? A Qualitative Research Synthesis
Hilary Causer,
Kate Muse,
Jo Smith and
Eleanor Bradley
Additional contact information
Hilary Causer: School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester WR2 6AJ, UK
Kate Muse: School of Psychology, University of Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester WR2 6AJ, UK
Jo Smith: School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester WR2 6AJ, UK
Eleanor Bradley: School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester WR2 6AJ, UK
IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 18, 1-23
Abstract:
Recent research has highlighted that the number of people impacted by a death by suicide is far greater than previously estimated and includes wider networks beyond close family members. It is important to understand the ways in which suicide impacts different groups within these wider networks so that safe and appropriate postvention support can be developed and delivered. A systematic review in the form of a qualitative research synthesis was undertaken with the aim of addressing the question ‘what are the features of the experiences of workers in health, education or social care roles following the death by suicide of a client, patient, student or service user?’ The analysis developed three categories of themes, ‘Horror, shock and trauma’, ‘Scrutiny, judgement and blame’, and ‘Support, learning and living with’. The mechanisms of absolution and incrimination were perceived to impact upon practitioners’ experiences within social and cultural contexts. Practitioners need to feel prepared for the potential impacts of a suicide and should be offered targeted postvention support to help them in processing their responses and in developing narratives that enable continued safe practice. Postvention responses need to be contextualised socially, culturally and organisationally so that they are sensitive to individual need.
Keywords: postvention; suicide; suicide loss; suicide bereavement; practitioner; systematic review; qualitative research synthesis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3293/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3293/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3293-:d:265135
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().