EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do Barrier Test Results Predict Survival in Specialist Police Tactical Selection Courses?

Jeremy Robinson, Ben Schram, Elisa Canetti and Robin Orr
Additional contact information
Jeremy Robinson: Specialist Response Group—Tactical Response Team, Australian Federal Police, Canberra 2601, Australia
Ben Schram: Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia
Elisa Canetti: Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia
Robin Orr: Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 18, 1-6

Abstract: Entry to specialist police tactical teams is governed by performance on a physically intense and psychologically demanding selection course. The aim of this study was to determine the attributes associated with completion of a specialist police selection course. Data pertaining to 18 candidates was obtained including 1 min push-ups, loaded pull-ups, loaded 30 m crawl, agility run, 1.2 km run and multi-stage fitness assessment. Comparisons from those who did and did not complete the selection week were performed and a hierarchical multiple regression performed. Eleven candidates finished, with significant difference found in those who completed the course in push-ups (+9.1 reps), loaded pull-ups (+2.9 reps), 1.2 km run (−16 s), loaded crawl (−6.3 s), agility (−0.67 s) and VO 2max (+4.8 mL/kg/min). In combination, the fitness assessments pull-ups, 30 m loaded crawl and agility time were found to predict 70% of the variability in course completion (adjusted R 2 = 0.70, F (3,14) = 14.373, p = 0.001). When assessed independently, push-ups, 1.2 km run and VO 2max results only predicted a non-significant 0.02%, 0.29% and 0.12%, respectively, of course completion. Completion was influenced by aerobic fitness, upper limb strength and endurance and agility. These variables appear to be predictive of course success.

Keywords: SWAT; special forces; barrier testing; tactical; law enforcement; strength; agility; aerobic capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3319/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3319/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3319-:d:265625

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3319-:d:265625