Graphic Warning Labels Affect Hypothetical Cigarette Purchasing Behavior among Smokers Living with HIV

Lauren R. Pacek, Meredith S. Berry, Olga Rass, Melissa Mercincavage, F. Joseph McClernon and Matthew W. Johnson
Additional contact information
Lauren R. Pacek: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
Meredith S. Berry: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
Olga Rass: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
Melissa Mercincavage: Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
F. Joseph McClernon: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
Matthew W. Johnson: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 18, 1-13

Abstract: Cigarette pack graphic warning labels (GWLs) are associated with increased knowledge of tobacco-related harms; scant research has evaluated their effects on behavior among vulnerable populations. We used a behavioral economic approach to measure the effects of GWLs and price on hypothetical cigarette purchasing behavior among HIV-positive smokers. Participants (n = 222) completed a cigarette valuation task by making hypothetical choices between GWL cigarette packs at a fixed price ($7.00) and text-only warning label cigarette packs at increasing prices ($3.50 to $14.00; $0.25 increments). More than one-quarter (28.8%) of participants paid more to avoid GWLs. The remaining participants’ purchasing decisions appear to have been driven by price: 69.8% of participants chose the cheaper pack. Across all participants, overall monetary choice value observed for GWL cigarette packs (mean = $7.75) was greater than if choice was driven exclusively by price ($7.00). Most (87.4%) preferred the text-only warning label when GWL and text-only cigarette packs were equally priced. Correlation analysis indicated GWL pack preference was associated with agreement with statements that GWLs would stop individuals from having a cigarette or facilitate thoughts about quitting. These data suggest that GWLs may influence some HIV-positive smokers in such a way that they are willing to pay more to avoid seeing GWLs.

Keywords: graphic warning labels; pictorial warning labels; tobacco control; tobacco; smoking; HIV; comorbidity; behavioral economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3380/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3380/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3380-:d:266692

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().