Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services
Imran Khan,
Hongdou Lei,
Gaffar Ali,
Shahid Ali and
Minjuan Zhao
Additional contact information
Imran Khan: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China
Hongdou Lei: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China
Gaffar Ali: Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan
Shahid Ali: Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan
Minjuan Zhao: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China
IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 19, 1-17
Abstract:
River basins are key sources of ecosystem services, with a wide range of social and economic benefits and many effects on human well-being. However, intensified land use and other dramatic variations in river ecosystems can alter ecosystem functions and services. In this study, we explored the public awareness, attitude and perception regarding environmental and water resource issues and assessed the willingness to pay (WTP) for improving selected attributes of the Wei River basin. Various rankings, Likert scales and random parameter logit (RPL) models were used to analyze data obtained from 900 surveyed respondents. Most respondents were more concerned about environmental and water resource management issues rather than socioeconomic attributes. From a policy perspective, 83.32% and 50.50% of the residents ranked “improvement in water quality” and “improving irrigation conditions,” respectively, as their main priorities regarding ecological restoration. Moreover, the results obtained using RPL models showed that the coefficients were significant for all ecological attributes and monetary attributes, as expected. The positive and significant coefficient for the alternative specific constant demonstrated that the respondents preferred restoration alternatives to the status quo. Furthermore, the highest WTP was found for water quality (91.99 RMB), followed by erosion intensity (23.59 RMB) and water quantity (11.79 RMB). Our results are relevant to policy development and they indicate that ecological restoration is the favored option.
Keywords: Ecosystem services; Environmental awareness; Environmental policy; Public attitude; Random parameter logit (RPL) model; Water quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3707/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3707/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3707-:d:272818
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().