Methods in Experimental Work Break Research: A Scoping Review

André Scholz, Johannes Wendsche, Argang Ghadiri, Usha Singh, Theo Peters and Stefan Schneider
Additional contact information
André Scholz: Department of Management Science, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Johannes Wendsche: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Dresden, 01099 Dresden, Germany
Argang Ghadiri: Department of Management Science, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Usha Singh: Department of Management Science, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Theo Peters: Department of Management Science, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Stefan Schneider: Institute of Movement and Neuroscience, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 20, 1-23

Abstract: The number of studies on work breaks and the importance of this subject is growing rapidly, with research showing that work breaks increase employees’ wellbeing and performance and workplace safety. However, comparing the results of work break research is difficult since the study designs and methods are heterogeneous and there is no standard theoretical model for work breaks. Based on a systematic literature search, this scoping review included a total of 93 studies on experimental work break research conducted over the last 30 years. This scoping review provides a first structured evaluation regarding the underlying theoretical framework, the variables investigated, and the measurement methods applied. Studies using a combination of measurement methods from the categories “self-report measures,” “performance measures,” and “physiological measures” are most common and to be preferred in work break research. This overview supplies important information for ergonomics researchers allowing them to design work break studies with a more structured and stronger theory-based approach. A standard theoretical model for work breaks is needed in order to further increase the comparability of studies in the field of experimental work break research in the future.

Keywords: experimental design; work break; performance measure; physiological measure; self-report measure; rest break; pause (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3844/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3844/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:3844-:d:275360

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().