EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York

Nathan Mann, James Nonnemaker, Kevin Davis, LeTonya Chapman, Jesse Thompson and Harlan R. Juster
Additional contact information
Nathan Mann: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
James Nonnemaker: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Kevin Davis: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
LeTonya Chapman: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Jesse Thompson: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Harlan R. Juster: Bureau of Tobacco Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12242, USA

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 22, 1-12

Abstract: Receiving smoking cessation services from telephone quitlines significantly increases quit success compared with no intervention or other quitting methods. To affect population-level smoking, quitlines must provide a sufficient proportion of smokers with effective interventions. Nationally, quitlines reach around 1% of adult smokers annually. From 2011 through 2016, the average annual reach of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline (NYSSQL) was 2.9%. We used data on the reach and cessation outcomes of NYSSQL to estimate its current impact on population-level smoking prevalence and to estimate how much reach would have to increase to achieve population-level smoking prevalence reductions. We estimate NYSSQL is associated with a 0.02 to 0.04 percentage point reduction in smoking prevalence in New York annually. If NYSSQL achieved the recommended annual reach of 8% (CDC Best Practices) and 16% (NAQC), state-level prevalence would decrease by an estimated 0.07–0.12 and 0.13–0.24 percentage points per year, respectively. To achieve those recommended levels of reach, NYSSQL would need to provide services to approximately 3.5 to 6.9 times more smokers annually. Given their reach, quitlines are limited in their ability to affect population-level smoking. Increasing quitline reach may not be feasible and would likely be cost-prohibitive. It may be necessary to re-think the role of quitlines in tobacco control efforts. In New York, the quitline is being integrated into larger efforts to promote cessation through health systems change.

Keywords: quitlines; population impact; tobacco use cessation; tobacco control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4477/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4477/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4477-:d:286698

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4477-:d:286698