The Heterogeneous Effects of Different Environmental Policy Instruments on Green Technology Innovation

Ming Yi, Xiaomeng Fang, Le Wen, Fengtao Guang and Yao Zhang
Additional contact information
Ming Yi: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Xiaomeng Fang: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Le Wen: Energy Centre, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Fengtao Guang: School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
Yao Zhang: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-19

Abstract: Environmental regulation is an important driving force of green technology innovation. In this paper, environmental policy instruments are classified into three categories: command-control, market-incentive and social-will. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2017, a fixed effect model and a panel threshold regression model are used to test the heterogeneous effects of different types of environmental policy instruments on the green technology innovation in China. The results show that: (1) Overall, China’s environmental policy instruments do not provide sufficient impetus for green technology innovation; (2) The impact of command-control environmental policy instruments on green technology innovation has a single threshold effect. When its intensity exceeds a certain threshold, green technology innovation is improved. The impact of market-incentive environmental policy instruments on the green technology innovation shows a double threshold effect, that is to say, only when its intensity maintained within a reasonable interval, can green technology innovation be promoted by it; (3) There is significant spatial difference in the impact of different types of environmental policy instruments on green technology innovation. In order to induce green technology innovation, it is necessary to formulate a combined and differentiated environmental policy system, while rationally adjusting the strength of different types of environmental policy instruments.

Keywords: green technology innovation; environmental policy instruments; panel threshold estimation; regional heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4660/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4660/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4660-:d:289992

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().