EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Global and Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Models for Modeling PM 2.5 in Heilongjiang, China from 2015 to 2018

Qingbin Wei, Lianjun Zhang, Wenbiao Duan and Zhen Zhen
Additional contact information
Qingbin Wei: School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Lianjun Zhang: Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, One Forestry Drive, Syracuse, New York, NY 13210, USA
Wenbiao Duan: School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Zhen Zhen: School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 24, 1-20

Abstract: Objective: This study investigated the relationships between PM 2.5 and 5 criteria air pollutants (SO 2 , NO 2 , PM 10 , CO, and O 3 ) in Heilongjiang, China, from 2015 to 2018 using global and geographically and temporally weighted regression models. Methods: Ordinary least squares regression (OLS), linear mixed models (LMM), geographically weighted regression (GWR), temporally weighted regression (TWR), and geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) were applied to model the relationships between PM 2.5 and 5 air pollutants. Results: The LMM and all GWR-based models (i.e., GWR, TWR, and GTWR) showed great advantages over OLS in terms of higher model R 2 and more desirable model residuals, especially TWR and GTWR. The GWR, LMM, TWR, and GTWR improved the model explanation power by 3%, 5%, 12%, and 12%, respectively, from the R 2 (0.85) of OLS. TWR yielded slightly better model performance than GTWR and reduced the root mean squared errors (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the model residuals by 67% compared with OLS; while GWR only reduced RMSE and MAE by 15% against OLS. LMM performed slightly better than GWR by accounting for both temporal autocorrelation between observations over time and spatial heterogeneity across the 13 cities under study, which provided an alternative for modeling PM 2.5 . Conclusions: The traditional OLS and GWR are inadequate for describing the non-stationarity of PM 2.5 . The temporal dependence was more important and significant than spatial heterogeneity in our data. Our study provided evidence of spatial–temporal heterogeneity and possible solutions for modeling the relationships between PM 2.5 and 5 criteria air pollutants for Heilongjiang province, China.

Keywords: GTWR; GWR; TWR; LMM; PM 2.5; air pollutants (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5107/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5107/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5107-:d:297926

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5107-:d:297926