Challenges in Managing Acute Cardiovascular Diseases and Follow Up Care in Rural Areas: A Narrative Review
Sandra C. Thompson,
Lee Nedkoff,
Judith Katzenellenbogen,
Mohammad Akhtar Hussain and
Frank Sanfilippo
Additional contact information
Sandra C. Thompson: Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 109, Geraldton 6531, Australia
Lee Nedkoff: School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, M431, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Australia
Judith Katzenellenbogen: School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, M431, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Australia
Mohammad Akhtar Hussain: Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 109, Geraldton 6531, Australia
Frank Sanfilippo: School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, M431, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Australia
IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 24, 1-17
Abstract:
This narrative review explores relevant literature that is related to the challenges in implementing evidence-based management for clinicians in rural and remote areas, while primarily focussing on management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and follow up care. A targeted literature search around rural/urban differences in the management of ACS, cardiovascular disease, and cardiac rehabilitation identified multiple issues that are related to access, including the ability to pay, transport and geographic distances, delays in patients seeking care, access to diagnostic testing, and timely treatment in an appropriate facility. Workforce shortages or lack of ready access to relevant expertise, cultural differences, and complexity that arises from comorbidities and from geographical isolation amplified diagnostic challenges. Given the urgency in management of ACS, rural clinicians must act quickly to achieve optimal patient outcomes. New technologies and quality improvement approaches enable better access to rapid diagnosis, as well as specialist input and care. Achieving an uptake of cardiac rehabilitation in rural and remote settings poses challenges that may reduce with the use of alternative models to centre-based rehabilitation and use of modern technologies. Expediting improvement in cardiovascular outcomes and reducing rural disparities requires system changes and that clinicians embrace attention to prevention, emergency management, and follow up care in rural contexts.
Keywords: rural; remote; acute coronary syndrome; revascularization; cardiac rehabilitation; cardiovascular; prevention; workforce; primary care; access; outcomes; review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5126/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5126/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5126-:d:298241
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().