EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Bioaccumulation and Tissue Distribution of Arsenic Species in Tilapia

Jia Pei, Jinxing Zuo, Xiaoyan Wang, Jingyu Yin, Liping Liu and Wenhong Fan
Additional contact information
Jia Pei: School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Jinxing Zuo: School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Xiaoyan Wang: School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Jingyu Yin: School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Liping Liu: Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnostic and Traceability Technologies for Food Poisoning, Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100191, China
Wenhong Fan: School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-11

Abstract: Arsenic is a public concern due to its widespread occurrence and carcinogenicity. Consumption of arsenic-contaminated fish is an important exposure pathway for human health. This study focused on understanding how exposure to arsenic-contaminated fish is informative to human health risk assessment. While the bioaccumulation and tissue distributions of total arsenic concentration in fish are commonly reported, there are limited studies related to the time-course of arsenic species in various tissues. Using the Tilapia as a case, this study aimed to investigate the bioaccumulation and tissue distributions (liver, gastrointestinal (GI), muscle, and gill) of arsenic species in freshwater fish via diet-borne inorganic arsenic exposure. In particular, the Tilapia were exposed to arsenic (III) and As(V) for 32 days. The accumulation of arsenic in all tissues linearly increased with time in the first 10 days’ exposure, while the arsenic levels remained stable in the following 20 days’ exposure. The accumulation of arsenic in tissue followed the sequence of intestine > liver > gill > muscle. Meanwhile, more than 90% of arsenic was converted into organic form in liver, gill, and muscle, while organic arsenic contributed about 30–80% to the total arsenic in the GI. The percentage of organic form in muscle is the highest, followed by gill, liver, and intestine, and arsenobetaine is the main form of organic arsenic. While the exposure profiles of As(III) and As(V) are quite similar, the absorption rate of As(V) is relatively higher than that of As(III). Information provided here can be instrumental for exposure assessment and risk management for arsenic in aquatic environment.

Keywords: arsenic; tissue distribution; bioaccumulation; tilapia; risk assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/5/757/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/5/757/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:5:p:757-:d:210420

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:5:p:757-:d:210420