Identifying Participants Who Would Benefit the Most from an Adult Food-literacy Program
Andrea Begley,
Ellen Paynter,
Lucy M. Butcher,
Vanessa Bobongie and
Satvinder S. Dhaliwal
Additional contact information
Andrea Begley: School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
Ellen Paynter: School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
Lucy M. Butcher: Foodbank Western Australia, Perth Airport 6105, Australia
Vanessa Bobongie: Foodbank Western Australia, Perth Airport 6105, Australia
Satvinder S. Dhaliwal: School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 7, 1-16
Abstract:
Food literacy programs aim to improve behaviours required to achieve a quality diet. The objectives of this study were to assess the demographic, food literacy related and dietary behaviour of participants enrolling in Food Sensations ® for Adults, a free four-week food literacy program and identify the subgroup of participants who benefit most. Cross-sectional pre-program questionnaire data (n = 1626) from participants enrolling in the program was used to stratify into low, middle and high food-literacy tertiles. Factor scores from a reliability analysis of food literacy behaviours were then used to produce a composite score). Participants were 80.2% female, 56% aged 26 to 45 years and 73.3% from low to middle socio-economic areas. Demographic characteristics were not a significant predictor of the lowest composite food-literacy group. Those with the lowest composite food-literacy tertile score were more likely to have lower self-rated cooking skills, a negative attitude to the cost of healthy foods, lower intakes of fruits and vegetables and a higher frequency of consuming takeaway food and sugary drinks. Food literacy programs must focus on recruiting those who have low self-rated cooking skills, who consider healthy foods expensive and have poor dietary intakes and will most likely to benefit from such programs.
Keywords: food literacy; community participation; dietary intake (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1272/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1272/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1272-:d:221301
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().