EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Physical Fitness of School-Age Children after Cancer Treatment

Iwona Malicka, Joanna Mrowiec, Natalia Sajkiewicz, Katarzyna Siewierska, Maria Czajkowska and Marek Woźniewski
Additional contact information
Iwona Malicka: The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland
Joanna Mrowiec: The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland
Natalia Sajkiewicz: The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland
Katarzyna Siewierska: The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland
Maria Czajkowska: “Cape of Hope” Clinic of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Oncology and Hematology, Wroclaw University Clinical Hospital, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
Marek Woźniewski: The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland

IJERPH, 2019, vol. 16, issue 8, 1-11

Abstract: The aim of the study was to assess physical fitness of school-age children after cancer treatment. The study was comprised of one hundred and fifty six children—children after cancer treatment ( n = 71, mean age 11.22 ± 3.11 years) vs. healthy children previously untreated for cancer ( n = 85, mean age 10.71 ± 1.22 years). Physical fitness was assessed indirectly based on a ball throw (assessment of strength, coordination, and upper limb speed), long jump (assessment of jumping ability, speed, and coordination), and a 60 m run (assessment of speed). The analysis was performed based on the Student’s t-test for independent samples and the analysis of variance and the post-hoc least significant difference test (LSD test). Children from the study group threw the ball closer and had shorter long jump performance compared to the control group, i.e., 12.93 [m] vs. 19.79 [m], respectively ( p < 0.001) and 2.46 [m] vs. 2.70 [m], respectively ( p = 0.02). However, their mean running time was longer, i.e., 13.33 [s] vs. 11.73 [s], respectively ( p = 0.01). Division according to sex showed additionally significantly shorter ball throw distance in the study group in both girls ( p = 0.001) and boys ( p < 0.001), significantly shorter jump length in the group of girls ( p = 0.01), and significantly longer running time in the group of boys ( p = 0.04). Children treated for cancer are characterized by decreased physical fitness, and motor ability is sex-dependent. Both groups showed decreased strength, coordination, and upper limb speed. Additionally, worse jumping ability was found in girls whereas decreased speed was observed in boys.

Keywords: child health; cancer; physical activity; physical fitness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/8/1436/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/8/1436/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:8:p:1436-:d:225049

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:8:p:1436-:d:225049