Community Group Model Building as a Method for Engaging Participants and Mobilising Action in Public Health

Sarah Gerritsen, Sophia Harré, David Rees, Ana Renker-Darby, Ann E. Bartos, Wilma E. Waterlander and Boyd Swinburn
Additional contact information
Sarah Gerritsen: School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Sophia Harré: School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
David Rees: Synergia Consulting Ltd, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
Ana Renker-Darby: School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Ann E. Bartos: School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Wilma E. Waterlander: Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Boyd Swinburn: School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-12

Abstract: Group model building (GMB) is a qualitative method aimed at engaging stakeholders to collectively consider the causes of complex problems. Tackling inequities in community nutrition is one such complex problem, as the causes are driven by a variety of interactions between individual factors, social structures, local environments and the global food system. This methods paper describes a GMB process that utilises three system mapping tools in a study with members of a multicultural, low-income community to explore declining fruit and vegetable intake in children. The tools were: (1) graphs over time, which captures the community’s understanding of an issue; (2) cognitive mapping, which enables participants to think systemically about the causes and consequences of the issue; (3) causal loop diagrams, which describe feedback loops that reinforce the issue and identify potential actions. Cognitive mapping, a tool not usually associated with GMB, was added to the research process to support the gradual development of participants’ thinking and develops the skills needed to tackle an issue from a systems perspective. We evaluate the benefits and impact of these three tools, particularly in engaging participants and increasing understanding of systems thinking in order to develop and mobilise action. The tools could be adapted for use in other community-based research projects. Key learnings were the value of genuine partnership with a local organisation for longevity of the project, recruitment of key decisionmakers from the community early in the process, and allowing time to create sustainable change.

Keywords: systems analysis; public health; poverty; vegetables; system dynamics; group model building; participatory research; children; qualitative methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3457/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3457/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3457-:d:358628

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().