Bioethical Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: Neonatologists’ Self-Reported Practices in Greek NICUs
Maria Dagla,
Vasiliki Petousi and
Antonios Poulios
Additional contact information
Maria Dagla: Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, 122 41 Athens, Greece
Vasiliki Petousi: Department of Sociology, University of Crete, 741 00 Rethymno, Greece
Antonios Poulios: Department of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-14
Abstract:
This study presents, for the first time, empirical data on practices regarding bioethical decision-making in treatment of preterm and ill newborns in Greece. The aim of the study was to: (a) record self-reported practices and involvement of Greek physicians in decisions of withholding and withdrawing neonatal intensive care, and (b) explore the implication of cultural, ethical, and professional parameters in decision-making. Methods: 71 physicians, employed fulltime in all public Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) (n = 17) in Greece, completed an anonymous questionnaire between May 2009 and May 2011. Results: One-third of the physicians in our sample admitted that they have, at least once in the past, decided the limitation of intensive care of a newborn close to death (37.7%) and/or a newborn with unfavorable neurological prognosis (30.8%). The higher the physicians’ support towards the value of quality of human life, the more probable it was that they had taken a decision to withhold or withdraw neonatal intensive care ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our research shows that Greek NICU physicians report considerably lower levels of ethical decision-making regarding preterm and ill newborns compared to their counterparts in other European countries. Clinical practices and attitudes towards ethical decision-making appear to be influenced mainly by the Greek physicians’ values.
Keywords: intensive care; NICU; ethical decision-making; withholding; withdrawing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3465/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3465/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3465-:d:358696
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().