Are There Effective Interventions to Increase Physical Activity in Children and Young People? An Umbrella Review

Alice Mannocci, Valeria D’Egidio, Insa Backhaus, Antonio Federici, Alessandra Sinopoli, Andrea Ramirez Varela, Paolo Villari and Giuseppe La Torre
Additional contact information
Alice Mannocci: Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, 00182 Rome, Italy
Valeria D’Egidio: Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, 00182 Rome, Italy
Insa Backhaus: Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, 00182 Rome, Italy
Antonio Federici: Ministry of Health, 00144 Rome, Italy
Alessandra Sinopoli: Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit Roma 1, 00161 Rome, Italy
Andrea Ramirez Varela: College of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, 11001000 Bogota, Colombia
Paolo Villari: Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, 00182 Rome, Italy
Giuseppe La Torre: Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, 00182 Rome, Italy

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-11

Abstract: Background : Obesity and physical inactivity among children and young people are public health concerns. While numerous interventions to promote physical activity are available, little is known about the most effective ones. This study aimed to summarize the existing evidence on interventions that aim to increase physical activity. Methods : A systematic review of reviews was conducted. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from January 2010 until November 2017 were identified through PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, performed data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes as level of physical activity and body mass index were collected in order to assess the efficacy of interventions. Results : A total 30 studies examining physical activity interventions met the inclusion criteria, 15 systematic reviews and 15 meta-analyses. Most studies ( N = 20) were implemented in the school setting, three were developed in preschool and childcare settings, two in the family context, five in the community setting and one miscellaneous context. Results showed that eight meta-analyses obtained a small increase in physical activity level, out of which five were conducted in the school, two in the family and one in the community setting. Most promising programs had the following characteristics: included physical activity in the school curriculum, were long-term interventions, involved teachers and had the support of families. Conclusion : The majority of interventions to promote physical activity in children and young people were implemented in the school setting and were multicomponent. Further research is needed to investigate nonschool programs.

Keywords: systematic review of review; health prevention; chronic diseases; physical activity programs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3528/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3528/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3528-:d:359624

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().