Development of a Geogenic Radon Hazard Index—Concept, History, Experiences
Peter Bossew,
Giorgia Cinelli,
Giancarlo Ciotoli,
Quentin G. Crowley,
Marc De Cort,
Javier Elío Medina,
Valeria Gruber,
Eric Petermann and
Tore Tollefsen
Additional contact information
Peter Bossew: German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), 10318 Berlin, Germany
Giorgia Cinelli: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy
Giancarlo Ciotoli: Institute of Environmental Geology and Geoengineering, National Research Council, Rome 00015, Italy
Quentin G. Crowley: School of Natural Sciences, Geology, Trinity College, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
Marc De Cort: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy
Javier Elío Medina: Department of Planning, Aalborg University, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
Valeria Gruber: Department for Radon and Radioecology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), 4020 Linz, Austria
Eric Petermann: German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), 10318 Berlin, Germany
Tore Tollefsen: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy
IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-23
Abstract:
Exposure to indoor radon at home and in workplaces constitutes a serious public health risk and is the second most prevalent cause of lung cancer after tobacco smoking. Indoor radon concentration is to a large extent controlled by so-called geogenic radon, which is radon generated in the ground. While indoor radon has been mapped in many parts of Europe, this is not the case for its geogenic control, which has been surveyed exhaustively in only a few countries or regions. Since geogenic radon is an important predictor of indoor radon, knowing the local potential of geogenic radon can assist radon mitigation policy in allocating resources and tuning regulations to focus on where it needs to be prioritized. The contribution of geogenic to indoor radon can be quantified in different ways: the geogenic radon potential (GRP) and the geogenic radon hazard index (GRHI). Both are constructed from geogenic quantities, with their differences tending to be, but not always, their type of geographical support and optimality as indoor radon predictors. An important feature of the GRHI is consistency across borders between regions with different data availability and Rn survey policies, which has so far impeded the creation of a European map of geogenic radon. The GRHI can be understood as a generalization or extension of the GRP. In this paper, the concepts of GRP and GRHI are discussed and a review of previous GRHI approaches is presented, including methods of GRHI estimation and some preliminary results. A methodology to create GRHI maps that cover most of Europe appears at hand and appropriate; however, further fine tuning and validation remains on the agenda.
Keywords: geogenic radon hazard index; geogenic radon potential; European map of geogenic radon (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4134/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4134/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4134-:d:369519
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().