EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analysis of Motor Intervention Program on the Development of Gross Motor Skills in Preschoolers

Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban, Jaime Terry Andrés, Inmaculada Méndez and Ángela Morales
Additional contact information
Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban: Department of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, Campus Regional Excellence Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
Jaime Terry Andrés: Department of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, Campus Regional Excellence Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
Inmaculada Méndez: Department of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, Campus Regional Excellence Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
Ángela Morales: Department of Music, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 13, 1-12

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the influence of a structured movement activity program on the motor development of children aged three to five years attending preschool. Participants were 136 preschool students with normative development at three to four years old who lived in the Region of Murcia (Spain). The McCarthy Children’s Psychomotricity and Aptitude Scales (MSCA) battery of psychomotor tests was used to evaluate the motor development profiles of preschoolers before and after the intervention. The sample was divided into two groups: an intervention group (28 students) and a comparison group (108 students). A structured 24 week physical education program was used in the intervention group. An experiential program based on free play was used in the comparison group during the same period. Preschoolers in both groups got a significant improvement in the contrast of pre-intervention with post-intervention in limb coordination. Statistically significant differences in the post-intervention measurements between the comparison group and the intervention group on arm and leg coordination were observed, whereby the intervention group presented higher arm coordination values ( F 1,134 = 14,389, p = 0.000, η 2 = 0.097) and higher leg coordination values ( F 1,134 = 19,281, p = 0.000, η 2 = 0.126) than the comparison group. It was pointed out that structured physical activity education is better educational methodology than free play to achieve adequate motor development in preschool children.

Keywords: physical activity; motor development; motor activity program; preschool education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4891/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4891/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4891-:d:381285

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4891-:d:381285