The Curated Food System: A Limiting Aspirational Vision of What Constitutes “Good” Food

Lauri Andress, Carmen Byker Shanks, Annie Hardison-Moody, T. Elaine Prewitt, Paul Kinder and Lindsey Haynes-Maslow
Additional contact information
Lauri Andress: Department of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506-9190, USA
Carmen Byker Shanks: Department of Health and Human Development, Food and Health Lab, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59718, USA
Annie Hardison-Moody: Department of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
T. Elaine Prewitt: Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
Paul Kinder: Natural Resource Analysis Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
Lindsey Haynes-Maslow: Department of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-20

Abstract: In an effort to elucidate an aspirational vision for the food system and explore whether the characteristics of such a system inadvertently set unattainable standards for low-wealth rural communities, we applied discourse analysis to the following qualitative datasets: (1) interviews with food experts and advocates, (2) scholarly and grey literature, (3) industry websites, and (4) email exchanges between food advocates. The analysis revealed eight aspirational food system discourses: production, distribution, and infrastructure; healthy, organic, local food; behavioral health and education; sustainability; finance and investment; hunger relief; demand-side preferences; romanticized, community led transformations. Study findings reveal that of eight discourses, only three encompass the experiences of low-wealth rural residents. This aspirational food system may aggravate the lack of autonomy and powerlessness already experienced by low-wealth rural groups, perpetuate a sense of failure by groups who will be unable to reach the aspirational food vision, silence discourses that might question those that play a role in the inequitable distribution of income while sanctioning discourses that focus on personal or community solutions, and leave out other policy-based solutions that address issues located within the food system. Further research might explore how to draw attention to silenced discourses on the needs and preferences of low-wealth rural populations to ensure that the policies and programs promoted by food system experts mitigate poor diets caused by food insecurity. Further research is needed to inform policies and programs to mitigate food insecurity in low-wealth rural populations.

Keywords: rural; food system; inequities; disparities; food security (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6157/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6157/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6157-:d:403557

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().