Time to Exhaustion at the Respiratory Compensation Point in Recreational Cyclists

Susana Moral-González, Javier González-Sánchez, Pedro L. Valenzuela, Sonia García-Merino, Carlos Barbado, Alejandro Lucia, Carl Foster and David Barranco-Gil
Additional contact information
Susana Moral-González: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
Javier González-Sánchez: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
Pedro L. Valenzuela: Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, 28805 Madrid, Spain
Sonia García-Merino: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
Carlos Barbado: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
Alejandro Lucia: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
Carl Foster: Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
David Barranco-Gil: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-9

Abstract: The time to exhaustion (t lim ) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) and whether a physiological steady state is observed at this workload remains unknown. Thus, this study analyzed t lim at the power output eliciting the RCP (t lim at RCP), the oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) response to this effort, and the influence of endurance fitness. Sixty male recreational cyclists (peak oxygen uptake [VO 2peak ] 40–60 mL?kg?min −1 ) performed an incremental test to determine the RCP, VO 2peak , and maximal aerobic power (MAP). They also performed constant-load tests to determine the t lim at RCP and t lim at MAP. Participants were divided based on their VO 2peak into a low-performance group (LP, n = 30) and a high-performance group (HP, n = 30). The t lim at RCP averaged 20 min 32 s ± 5 min 42 s, with a high between-subject variability (coefficient of variation 28%) but with no differences between groups ( p = 0.788, effect size = 0.06). No consistent relationships were found between the t lim at RCP and the different fitness markers analyzed (RCP, power output (PO) at RCP, VO 2peak , MAP, or t lim at MAP; all p > 0.05). VO 2 remained steady overall during the t lim test, although a VO 2 slow component (i.e., an increase in VO 2 >200 mL·min −1 from the third min to the end of the tests) was present in 33% and 40% of the participants in HP and LP, respectively. In summary, the PO at RCP could be maintained for about 20 min. However, there was a high between-subject variability in both the t lim and in the VO 2 response to this effort that seemed to be independent of fitness level, which raises concerns on the suitability of this test for fitness assessment.

Keywords: anaerobic threshold; t lim; functional threshold power; endurance performance; cycling; testing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6352/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6352/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6352-:d:406768

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().