What Psychosocial and Physical Characteristics Differentiate Office Workers Who Develop Standing-Induced Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Study

Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero, Michelle D Smith, Alejandro Quintela-del-Rio and Venerina Johnston
Additional contact information
Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero: Psychosocial Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de A Coruña, 15071 A Coruna, Spain
Michelle D Smith: School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Alejandro Quintela-del-Rio: Psychosocial Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universidade de A Coruna, 15071 A Coruna, Spain
Venerina Johnston: School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-14

Abstract: This study examines demographic, physical and psychosocial factors associated with an increase in low back pain (LBP) during a one-hour standing task. A cross-sectional survey with 40 office workers was conducted. The primary outcome was pain severity during a one-hour standing task recorded every 15 min using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants were defined as pain developers (PD), if they reported a change in pain of ≥10 mm from baseline, or non-pain developers (NPD). Physical outcomes included participant-rated and examiner-rated trunk and hip motor control and endurance. Self-report history of LBP, physical activity, psychosocial job characteristics, general health and pain catastrophising were collected. Fourteen participants were PD. Hip abduction, abdominal and spinal muscle endurance was lower for PD ( p ≤ 0.05). PD had greater self-reported difficulty performing active hip abduction and active straight leg raise tests ( p ≤ 0.04). Those reporting a lifetime, 12 month or 7-day history of LBP ( p < 0.05) and lower self-reported physical function ( p = 0.01) were more likely to develop LBP during the standing task. In conclusion, a history of LBP, reduced trunk and hip muscle endurance and deficits in lumbopelvic/hip motor control may be important to consider in office workers experiencing standing-induced LBP.

Keywords: low back pain (LBP); standing position; musculoskeletal pain; sedentary behaviour (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7104/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7104/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7104-:d:420806

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().