Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Vedrana Sember, Kaja Meh, Maroje Sorić, Gregor Starc, Paulo Rocha and Gregor Jurak
Additional contact information
Vedrana Sember: Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Kaja Meh: Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Maroje Sorić: Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Gregor Starc: Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Paulo Rocha: Portuguese Institute of Sport and Youth, 1250-190 Lisbon, Portugal
Gregor Jurak: Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-23

Abstract: This review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020138845) critically evaluates test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and criterion validity of different physical activity (PA) levels of three most commonly used international PA questionnaires (PAQs) in official language versions of European Union (EU): International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF), Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), and European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). In total, 1749 abstracts were screened, 287 full-text articles were identified as relevant to the study objectives, and 20 studies were included. The studies’ results and quality were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires checklist. Results indicate that only ten EU countries validated official language versions of selected PAQs. A meta-analysis revealed that assessment of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) is the most relevant PA level outcome, since no publication bias in any of measurement properties was detected while test-retest reliability was moderately high (r w = 0.74), moderate for the criterion (r w = 0.41) and moderately-high for concurrent validity (r w = 0.72). Reporting of methods and results of the studies was poor, with an overall moderate risk of bias with a total score of 0.43. In conclusion, where only self-reporting of PA is feasible, assessment of MVPA with selected PAQs in EU adult populations is recommended.

Keywords: measurement characteristics; policy; European Union; measurement properties; language version; IPAQ; GPAQ; EHIS-PAQ (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7161/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7161/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7161-:d:421866

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().