EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Agility Testing in Youth Football (Soccer)Players; Evaluating Reliability, Validity, and Correlates of Newly Developed Testing Protocols

Ante Krolo, Barbara Gilic, Nikola Foretic, Haris Pojskic, Raouf Hammami, Miodrag Spasic, Ognjen Uljevic, Sime Versic and Damir Sekulic
Additional contact information
Ante Krolo: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Barbara Gilic: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Nikola Foretic: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Haris Pojskic: Department of Sports Science, Linnaeus University, 39182 Kalmar, Sweden
Raouf Hammami: Research Unit, Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, UR15JS01, High Institute of Sport and PhysicalEducation of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia
Miodrag Spasic: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Ognjen Uljevic: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Sime Versic: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Damir Sekulic: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: Reactive agility (RAG) and change of direction speed (CODS) are important determinants of success in football (soccer), but there is an evident lack of information on reliable and valid football-specific testing procedures which will be applicable in defining sport-specific RAG and CODS in youth players. This study evaluated reliability and construct validity of newly developed tests of football-specific RAG (FS_RAG) and CODS (FS_CODS), which involved the ball kicking football technique. Additionally, factors associated with FS_RAG and FS_CODS were evaluated. The participants were youth football players (n = 59; age: 13.40 ± 1.25 years) divided according to their age into U13 (11–12 years of age; n = 29), and U15 (13–14 years of age; n = 30) categories. Additionally, performance levels (starters [first-team] vs. non-starters [substitutes]) were observed in each age category. The dependent variables were newly developed FS_RAG and FS_CODS tests. The independent variables were sprinting capacities over 10 and 20 meters (S10M, S20M), countermovement jump (CMJ), the reactive strength index (RSI), and a generic CODS test of 20 yards (20Y). The newly developed FS_CODS and FS_RAG were observed as dependent variables. Results showed appropriate intra-testing and inter-testing reliability of the FS_RAG and FS_CODS, with somewhat better reliability of the FS_CODS (ICC=0.82 and 0.79, respectively). Additionally, better reliability was evidenced in U15 than in U13 (ICC: 0.82–0.85, and 0.78-0.80 for U15 and U13, respectively). Independent samples t-test indicated significant differences between U13 and U15 in S10 ( t -test: 3.57, p < 0.001), S20M ( t -test: 3.13, p < 0.001), 20Y ( t -test: 4.89, p < 0.001), FS_RAG ( t -test: 3.96, p < 0.001), and FS_CODS ( t -test: 6.42, p < 0.001), with better performance in U15. Starters outperformed non-starters in most capacities among U13, but only in FS_RAG among U15 ( t -test: 1.56, p < 0.05). Multiple regression calculations indicated nonsignificant association between independent and dependent variables in U13 (FS_CODS: 19%, FS_RAG: 21% of the explained variance, both p > 0.05), but independent variables explained significant proportion of both dependent variables in U15 (FS_CODS: 35%, FS_RAG: 33% explained variance, both p < 0.05). The study confirmed the applicability of newly developed tests in distinguishing studied age categories of players. Results indicate that superiority in all studied fitness capacities is translated into performance level in U13. Meanwhile, FS_RAG seems to be important determinant of quality in U15.

Keywords: team sports; pre-planned agility; non-planned agility; determinants; soccer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/294/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/294/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:294-:d:303929

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:294-:d:303929