Trust, Connection and Equity: Can Understanding Context Help to Establish Successful Campus Community Gardens?

Pauline Marsh, Suzanne Mallick, Emily Flies, Penelope Jones, Sue Pearson, Iain Koolhof, Jason Byrne and Dave Kendal
Additional contact information
Pauline Marsh: Centre for Rural Health, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Suzanne Mallick: Centre for Rural Health, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Emily Flies: School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Penelope Jones: Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Sue Pearson: School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Iain Koolhof: School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Jason Byrne: School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia
Dave Kendal: School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-25

Abstract: Campus community gardens (CCGs) can potentially improve student health and wellbeing, mitigate social and ecological problems, and nurture university-community relationships. However, CCGs are located in complex socio-political and ecological settings and many community gardens struggle or fail. However, few studies have assessed the socio-political/ecological context of a garden setting prior to its development to understand the potential barriers and enablers of success. Our study assessed the socio-spatial context of a proposed CCG at a student university accommodation site. We engaged diverse university and community stakeholders through interviews, focus groups and a survey to explore their perceptions of the space generally and the proposed garden specifically. Visual observations and public life surveying were used to determine patterns of behavior. Results confirmed known problems associated with an underutilized site that provides little opportunity for lingering or contact with nature; and unknown barriers, including socially disconnected stakeholders and community distrust of the university. The research also uncovered positive enablers, such as stakeholder appreciation of the social, wellbeing and ecological benefits that a CCG could deliver. Our findings suggest that an in-depth exploration of a proposed garden context can be an important enabler of its success.

Keywords: campus community garden; health; socio-spatial connection; trust; sustainability; university students; wellbeing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7476/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7476/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7476-:d:428003

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().