Social Intelligence and Psychological Distress: Subjective and Psychological Well-Being as Mediators

Carolina M. Azañedo, Santiago Sastre, Teresa Artola, Jesús M. Alvarado and Amelia Jiménez-Blanco
Additional contact information
Carolina M. Azañedo: Department of Psychology, Villanueva University, 28034 Madrid, Spain
Santiago Sastre: Department of Psychology, Villanueva University, 28034 Madrid, Spain
Teresa Artola: Department of Psychology, Villanueva University, 28034 Madrid, Spain
Jesús M. Alvarado: School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain
Amelia Jiménez-Blanco: School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 21, 1-11

Abstract: The strength named “social intelligence” in the Values in Action (VIA) Classification of Character Strengths and Virtues represents emotional, personal, and social intelligences, which are considered “hot intelligences”. This work contributed to the study of the mechanisms of influence of social intelligence on mental health. A multiple mediation model was proposed to quantify the direct effect of social intelligence on psychopathological symptoms, as well as its indirect effect through its impact on components of subjective and psychological well-being. This study involved 1407 university students who completed the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the Psychological Well-Being Scales (PWBS), and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Social intelligence was found to be significantly associated with life satisfaction ( a = 0.33, p < 0.001), positive affect ( a = 0.42, p < 0.001), and negative affect ( a = −0.21, p < 0.001), transmitting significant indirect effects on psychopathological symptomatology through these components of subjective well-being. Likewise, social intelligence was positively and significantly related to psychological well-being ( a -paths ranged from 0.31 to 0.43, p < 0.001), exerting significant and negative indirect effects on psychological distress through the dimension of positive relations with other people. These results could be useful in order to expand the explanatory models of the influence of social intelligence on mental health and to design interventions based on this strength for the promotion of well-being and the reduction in psychological distress.

Keywords: social intelligence; subjective well-being; psychological well-being; psychological distress (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7785/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7785/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7785-:d:434081

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().