Psychological Distress of University Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil

Fernanda Barcellos Serralta, Murilo Ricardo Zibetti and Chris Evans
Additional contact information
Fernanda Barcellos Serralta: Post Graduate Program in Psychology, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-970, Brazil
Murilo Ricardo Zibetti: Post Graduate Program in Psychology, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-970, Brazil
Chris Evans: Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 1HD, UK

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 22, 1-18

Abstract: The study aimed to explore mental distress during COVID-19 quarantine in a sample of university workers in Brazil. The survey included sets of questions about demographics, health, and support, an open question about major concerns, and the Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM), a measure of mental distress. A total of 407 professionals, mean age 40, SD 11.2, fulfilling social distancing (99%) participated in the study. Participants were mostly female (67.8%) and married (64.8%). Using the Consensual Qualitative Research process for simple qualitative data (CQR-M), the main areas of concern were grouped into six domains, as follows: work, health, isolation, personal life and routine, social environment, and future. Many responses were multiple. They form categories indicating specific concerns within these domains. Quantitative data were analyzed by identifying the simple effects of potential predictors of mental distress. The results indicated medium effects of help with household chores (η 2 = 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.022–0.095)), psychiatric treatment (η 2 = 0.06, CI (0.030–0.110)), age (η 2 = 0.12, CI (0.070–0.170)), and physical exercise (η 2 = 0.12, CI (0.079–0.180)). Having someone available to listen was the only variable with a large effect associated with reduced mental suffering (η 2 = 0.18; CI (0.118–0.227)). Psychological experiences of the pandemic are multifaceted and complex. Thus, substantially larger surveys, with both quantitative and qualitative components, are needed.

Keywords: COVID-19; pandemics; quarantine; psychological distress; cross-sectional studies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8520/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8520/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8520-:d:446423

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().