EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels

Danica Janicijevic, Olivera M. Knezevic, Amador Garcia-Ramos, Danilo Cvetic and Dragan M. Mirkov
Additional contact information
Danica Janicijevic: Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia
Olivera M. Knezevic: Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia
Amador Garcia-Ramos: Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
Danilo Cvetic: Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia
Dragan M. Mirkov: Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 22, 1-12

Abstract: Background: Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels. Methods: The concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [ F 0 ], maximum velocity [ v 0 ], and maximum power [P max ]). Results: F 0 and P max were higher for knee extensors (effect size [ES] = 1.97 and 0.57, respectively), hip extensors (ES = 2.52 and 0.77, respectively), and shoulder flexors (ES = 1.67 and 0.83, respectively) compared to their antagonist muscles, while v 0 was higher for knee flexors compared to knee extensors (ES = 0.59). Active males revealed higher F 0 for knee extensors (ES = 0.72) and knee flexors (ES = 0.83) and higher P max for knee flexors (ES = 0.70), elbow extensors (ES = 0.83) and shoulder extensors (ES = 0.36). Conclusions: The sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint.

Keywords: flexors; extensors; knee; hip; elbow; shoulder (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8570/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8570/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8570-:d:447341

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8570-:d:447341