Teachers’ Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Thwarting: Can They Explain Students’ Behavioural Engagement in Physical Education? A Multi-Level Analysis

Javier Coterón, Evelia Franco, Carmen Ocete and Javier Pérez-Tejero
Additional contact information
Javier Coterón: Departamento de Ciencias Sociales de la Actividad Física, del Deporte y del Ocio, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte—INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Evelia Franco: Departamento de Educación, Métodos de Investigación y Evaluación, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Carmen Ocete: Departamento de Educación, Métodos de Investigación y Evaluación, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Javier Pérez-Tejero: Cátedra “Fundación Sanitas” de Estudios sobre Deporte Inclusivo, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte—INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 22, 1-15

Abstract: Students’ engagement in Physical Education has been linked to several adaptive consequences. Even though the existing literature suggests that perceived autonomy support can predict engagement, research is scarce on how teachers’ antecedents might influence this behavioural outcome. This study sought to compare the influence of teachers’ basic psychological needs’ satisfaction and basic psychological needs’ thwarting on students’ behavioural engagement and on the relationship between perceived autonomy-support and the students’ behavioural engagement. The sample included 29 Physical Education teachers and 644 students who were taught by the participants teachers. Data were collected using both paper and online surveys and they were analysed using multilevel modelling techniques. The results revealed that, while teachers’ autonomy satisfaction might be significant in the explanation of students’ engagement (? = 0.33, p < 0.01), it seems that needs thwarting could be a better predictor of this outcome (? autonomy thwarting = ?0.17, p < 0.01; ? competence thwarting = ?0.06, p < 0.05). These findings suggest the impact of certain external pressures on teachers’ practices which, in turn, might affect students’ behavioural outcomes.

Keywords: teachers’ antecedents; behavioural engagement; self-determination theory; autonomy support; multi-level analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8573/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8573/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8573-:d:447359

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().