EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Predicting Length of Stay and Discharge Destination for Surgical Patients: A Cohort Study

Fabrizio Bert, Omar Kakaa, Alessio Corradi, Annamaria Mascaro, Stefano Roggero, Daniela Corsi, Antonio Scarmozzino and Roberta Siliquini
Additional contact information
Fabrizio Bert: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Omar Kakaa: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Alessio Corradi: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Annamaria Mascaro: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Stefano Roggero: Department of Quality and Safety of Care, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Daniela Corsi: Department of Quality and Safety of Care, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Antonio Scarmozzino: Department of Quality and Safety of Care, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Roberta Siliquini: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 24, 1-10

Abstract: Discharge planning is important to prevent surgical site infections, reduce costs, and improve the hospitalization experience. The identification of early variables that can predict a longer-than-expected length of stay or the need for a discharge with additional needs can improve this process. A cohort study was conducted in the largest hospital of Northern Italy, collecting discharge records from January 2017 to January 2020 and pre-admission visits in the last three months. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected. Linear and logistic regression models were fitted. The main outcomes were the length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination. The main predictors of a longer LOS were the need for additional care at discharge (+10.76 days), hospitalization from the emergency department (ED) (+5.21 days), and age (+0.04 days per year), accounting for clinical variables ( p < 0.001 for all variables). Each year of age and hospitalization from the ED were associated with a higher probability of needing additional care at discharge (OR 1.02 and 1.77, respectively, p < 0.001). No additional findings came from pre-admission forms. Discharge difficulties seem to be related mainly to age and hospitalization procedures: those factors are probably masking underlying social risk factors that do not show up in patients with planned admissions.

Keywords: discharge planning; surgery; cohort study; early prediction; difficult discharge; length of stay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9490/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9490/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9490-:d:464290

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9490-:d:464290