Surgical Smoke—Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms

Martina Michaelis, Felix Martin Hofmann, Albert Nienhaus and Udo Eickmann
Additional contact information
Martina Michaelis: Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany
Felix Martin Hofmann: Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany
Albert Nienhaus: Department of Occupational Medicine, Hazardous Substances and Health Sciences, German Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), 20357 Hamburg, Germany
Udo Eickmann: Department of Occupational Medicine, Hazardous Substances and Health Sciences, German Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), Hazardous Substances and Toxicology Division, 50968 Cologne, Germany

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 2, 1-16

Abstract: (1) Background: Hazardous substances in surgical smoke that is generated during laser or electrosurgery pose a potential health hazard. In Germany, the Technical Rules for Hazardous Substances (TRGS 525) have included recommendations for appropriate protective measures since 2014. Up to now, no empirical data has been available on the extent to which recommendations have been implemented in practice. (2) Methods: In 2018, 7089 surgeons in hospitals and outpatient practices were invited by email to participate in an online survey. In addition, 219 technical assistants were interviewed. The questionnaire dealt with knowledge of, and attitudes toward, the hazard potential of surgical smoke, as well as the availability and actual use of protective measures. Furthermore, manufacturers and distributors of smoke extraction devices were asked to give their assessment of the development of prevention in recent years. (3) Results: The survey response rate was 5% (surgeons) and 65% (technical assistant staff). Half of all surgeons assumed that there were high health hazards of surgical smoke without taking protective measures. Operating room nurses were more often concerned (88%). Only a few felt properly informed about the topic. The TRGS recommendations had been read by a minority of the respondents. In total, 52% of hospital respondents and 65% of the respondents in outpatient facilities reported any type of special suction system to capture surgical smoke. One-fifth of respondents from hospitals reported that technical measures had improved since the introduction of the TRGS 525. Fifty-one percent of the surgeons in hospitals and 70% of the surgeons in outpatient facilities “mostly” or “always” paid attention to avoiding surgical smoke. The most important reason for non-compliance with recommendations was a lack of problem awareness or thoughtlessness. Twelve industrial interviewees who assessed the situation and the development of prevention in practice largely confirmed the prevention gaps observed; only slight developments were observed in recent years. (4) Conclusions: The low response rate among surgeons and the survey results both indicate a major lack of interest and knowledge. Among other measures, team interventions with advanced training are needed in the future.

Keywords: surgical smoke; hazard perceptions; protective measures; survey; surgeons; technical assistant staff (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/515/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/515/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:515-:d:308433

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().