EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-Thoracotomy Pain: A Cost-Effectiveness Study and A Feasibility for Its Future Implementation

Nemanja Rancic, Katarina Mladenovic, Nela V. Ilic, Viktorija Dragojevic-Simic, Menelaos Karanikolas, Tihomir V. Ilic and Dusica M. Stamenkovic
Additional contact information
Nemanja Rancic: Medical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
Katarina Mladenovic: Medical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
Nela V. Ilic: Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
Viktorija Dragojevic-Simic: Medical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
Menelaos Karanikolas: Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Tihomir V. Ilic: Medical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
Dusica M. Stamenkovic: Medical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 3, 1-9

Abstract: This prospective randomized study aims to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with patient controlled intravenous morphine analgesia (PCA-IV) as part of multimodal analgesia after thoracotomy. Patients assigned to the active treatment group (a-tDCS, n = 27) received tDCS over the left primary motor cortex for five days, whereas patients assigned to the control group (sham-tDCS, n = 28) received sham tDCS stimulations. All patients received postoperative PCA-IV morphine. For cost-effectiveness analysis we used data about total amount of PCA-IV morphine and maximum visual analog pain scale with cough (VASP-C max ). Direct costs of hospitalization were assumed as equal for both groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as the incremental cost (RSD or US$) per incremental gain in mm of VASP-C max reduction. Calculated ICER was 510.87 RSD per VASP-C max 1 mm reduction. Conversion on USA market (USA data 1.325 US$ for 1 mg of morphine) revealed ICER of 189.08 US$ or 18960.39 RSD/1 VASP-C max 1 mm reduction. Cost-effectiveness expressed through ICER showed significant reduction of PCA-IV morphine costs in the tDCS group. Further investigation of tDCS benefits with regards to reduction of postoperative pain treatment costs should also include the long-term benefits of reduced morphine use.

Keywords: morphine; transcranial direct current stimulation; acute pain; pain, postoperative; pharmacoeconomics; cost and cost analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/816/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/816/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:816-:d:313852

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:816-:d:313852