Levels and Determinants of Fine Particulate Matter and Carbon Monoxide in Kitchens Using Biomass and Non-Biomass Fuel for Cooking

Zafar Fatmi, Georgia Ntani and David Coggon
Additional contact information
Zafar Fatmi: Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, PO Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
Georgia Ntani: MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
David Coggon: MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 4, 1-10

Abstract: To assist interpretation of a study in rural Pakistan on the use of biomass for cooking and the risk of coronary heart disease, we continuously monitored airborne concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and carbon monoxide (CO) for up to 48 h in the kitchens of households randomly selected from the parent study. Satisfactory data on PM 2.5 and CO respectively were obtained for 16 and 17 households using biomass, and 19 and 17 using natural gas. Linear regression analysis indicated that in comparison with kitchens using natural gas, daily average PM 2.5 concentrations were substantially higher in kitchens that used biomass in either a chimney stove (mean difference 611, 95% CI: 359, 863 µg/m 3 ) or traditional three-stone stove (mean difference 389, 95% CI: 231, 548 µg/m 3 ). Daily average concentrations of CO were significantly increased when biomass was used in a traditional stove (mean difference from natural gas 3.7, 95% CI: 0.8, 6.7 ppm), but not when it was used in a chimney stove (mean difference −0.8, 95% CI: −4.8, 3.2 ppm). Any impact of smoking by household members was smaller than that of using biomass, and not clearly discernible. In the population studied, cooking with biomass as compared with natural gas should serve as a good proxy for higher personal exposure to PM 2.5 .

Keywords: biomass; natural gas; particulate matter; carbon monoxide; kitchen; monitoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1287/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1287/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1287-:d:321637

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().