EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain

Rafael Vila-Candel, Anna Martín, Ramón Escuriet, Enrique Castro-Sánchez and Francisco Javier Soriano-Vidal
Additional contact information
Rafael Vila-Candel: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, FISABIO. Crta. Corbera km 1, 46600 Valencia, Spain
Anna Martín: School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. C/Arzobispo Morcillo 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain
Ramón Escuriet: School of Health Sciences Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, C/Padilla 326, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
Enrique Castro-Sánchez: NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infections (HCAI) and Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) at Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
Francisco Javier Soriano-Vidal: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universitat de València, Jaume Roig, s/n, 46010 Valencia, Spain

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 5, 1-12

Abstract: Background: The WHO recommends the use of the Robson ten-group classification system (RTGCS) as an effective monitoring and analysis tool to assess the use of caesarean sections (CS). The present study aimed to conduct an analysis of births using the RTGCS in La Ribera University Hospital over nine years and to assess the levels and trends of CS births. Methods: Retrospective study between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. All eligible women were allocated in RTGCS to determine the absolute and relative contribution made by each group to the overall CS rate; linear regression and weighted least squares regression analysis were used to analyze trends over time. The risk of CS of women with induced versus spontaneous onset of labor was calculated with an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. Results: 16,506 women gave birth during the study period, 19% of them by CS. Overall, 20.4% of women were in group 1 (nulliparous, singleton cephalic, term, spontaneous labor), 29.4% in group 2 (nulliparous, singleton cephalic, term, induced labor or caesarean before labor), and 12.8% in group 4 (multiparous, singleton cephalic, term, induced or caesarean delivery before labor) made the most significant contributions to the overall rate of CS; Conclusions: In our study, Robson Groups 1, 2, and 4, were identified as the main contributors to the hospital’s overall CS rate. The RTGCS provides an easy way of collecting information about the CS rate, is a valuable clinical method that allows standardized comparison of data, and time point, and identifies the groups driving changes in CS rates.

Keywords: caesarean section; Robson ten-group classification system; labor; delivery classification; Spain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1575/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1575/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1575-:d:326508

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1575-:d:326508