Climate Change as an Involuntary Exposure: A Comparative Risk Perception Study from Six Countries across the Global Development Gradient

Meredith Gartin, Kelli L. Larson, Alexandra Brewis, Rhian Stotts, Amber Wutich, Dave White and Margaret du Bray
Additional contact information
Meredith Gartin: School of Public Health, University of Alabama Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd., 310F Ryals Public Health Building, Birmingham, AL 35205-0022, USA
Kelli L. Larson: School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO Box 87537-5302, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Alexandra Brewis: School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Rhian Stotts: School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Amber Wutich: School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Dave White: School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University 411 N. Central Ave., Ste. 550, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
Margaret du Bray: Environmental Studies, Augustana College, 639 38th Street, Rock Island, IL 61201, USA

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-17

Abstract: Climate change has been referred to as an involuntary exposure, meaning people do not voluntarily put themselves at risk for climate-related ill health or reduced standard of living. The purpose of this study is to examine people’s risk perceptions and related beliefs regarding (1) the likelihood of different risks occurring at different times and places and (2) collective (government) responsibility and personal efficacy in dealing with climate change, as well as (3) explore the ways in which climate risk may be amplified when posed against individual health and well-being. Previous research on this topic has largely focused on one community or one nation state, and so a unique characteristic of this study is the comparison between six different city (country) sites by their development and national wealth. Here, we collected 401 surveys from Phoenix (USA), Brisbane (Australia), Wellington (New Zealand), Shanghai (China), Viti Levu (Fiji), and Mexico City (Mexico). Results suggest that the hyperopia effect characterized the sample from each study site but was more pronounced in developed sites, suggesting that the more developed sites employ a broader perspective when approaching ways to mitigate their risk against climate-related health and well-being impacts.

Keywords: risk perceptions; comparative research; climate change; global health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1894/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1894/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1894-:d:332501

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().