Priority Setting for Management of Hazardous Biocides in Korea Using Chemical Ranking and Scoring Method

Yun-Hee Choi, Min-Sung Kang, Da-An Huh, Woo-Ri Chae and Kyong Whan Moon
Additional contact information
Yun-Hee Choi: Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
Min-Sung Kang: Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do 31151, Korea
Da-An Huh: Department of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
Woo-Ri Chae: Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
Kyong Whan Moon: Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-16

Abstract: Biocides are non-agricultural chemical agents for the prevention of unhygienic pests. The worldwide demand for biocidal products has been rapidly increasing. Meanwhile, biocides have been causing negative health effects for decades, resulting in public health scares. Therefore, governments around the world have tried to strictly control biocides, and it is necessary to prioritize the health risks of biocides for efficient management. Chemical ranking and scoring (CRS) methods have been developed for the effective management of chemicals. However, existing methods do not use suitable variables to evaluate biocides, thus possibly underestimating or overestimating the actual health risks. We developed a new CRS method that reflects the exposure and toxicity characteristics of biocides. Eleven indicators were chosen as appropriate for prioritizing biocides, and scoring based on the globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS) improved the efficiency of the method. Correlations between individual indicators in this study were low (?0.151–0.325), indicating that each indicator was independent and well-chosen for prioritizing biocides. The effect of each indicator on the total score showed that carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity (CMR) chemicals ranked high with r = 0.558. This result demonstrated that the most dangerous toxicants should play a more decisive role in the top ranking than the others. We expect that our method can be efficiently used to screen regulated biocides by prioritizing their health hazards, thus leading to better policy decision making about biocide use.

Keywords: biocide; health hazard; chemical ranking and scoring method; risk priority; GHS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1970/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1970/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1970-:d:333490

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().