Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool

Francesco Negrini, Giulio Gasperini, Eleonora Guanziroli, Jacopo Antonino Vitale, Giuseppe Banfi and Franco Molteni
Additional contact information
Francesco Negrini: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
Giulio Gasperini: Ospedale Valduce, Clinica Villa Beretta, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy
Eleonora Guanziroli: Ospedale Valduce, Clinica Villa Beretta, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy
Jacopo Antonino Vitale: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
Giuseppe Banfi: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
Franco Molteni: Ospedale Valduce, Clinica Villa Beretta, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 9, 1-16

Abstract: Monitoring the real-life mobility of stroke patients could be extremely useful for clinicians. Step counters are a widely accessible, portable, and cheap technology that can be used to monitor patients in different environments. The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost commercial tri-axial accelerometer-based step counter for stroke patients and to determine the best positioning of the step counter (wrists, ankles, and waist). Ten healthy subjects and 43 post-stroke patients were enrolled and performed four validated clinical tests (10 m, 50 m, and 6 min walking tests and timed up and go tests) while wearing five step counters in different positions while a trained operator counted the number of steps executed in each test manually. Data from step counters and those collected manually were compared using the intraclass coefficient correlation and mean average percentage error. The Bland–Altman plot was also used to describe agreement between the two quantitative measurements (step counter vs. manual counting). During walking tests in healthy subjects, the best reliability was found for lower limbs and waist placement (intraclass coefficient correlations (ICCs) from 0.46 to 0.99), and weak reliability was observed for upper limb placement in every test (ICCs from 0.06 to 0.38). On the contrary, in post-stroke patients, moderate reliability was found only for the lower limbs in the 6 min walking test (healthy ankle ICC: 0.69; pathological ankle ICC: 0.70). Furthermore, the Bland–Altman plot highlighted large average discrepancies between methods for the pathological group. However, while the step counter was not able to reliably determine steps for slow patients, when applied to the healthy ankle of patients who walked faster than 0.8 m/s, it counted steps with excellent precision, similar to that seen in the healthy subjects (ICCs from 0.36 to 0.99). These findings show that a low-cost accelerometer-based step counter could be useful for measuring mobility in select high-performance patients and could be used in clinical and real-world settings.

Keywords: step counter; accelerometer; stroke; gait; rehabilitation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3177/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3177/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3177-:d:353397

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().