EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Relationship between the Condylion–Gonion–Menton Angle and Dentoalveolar Heights

Rosa Valletta, Roberto Rongo, Ada Carolina Pango Madariaga, Roberta Baiano, Gianrico Spagnuolo and Vincenzo D’Antò
Additional contact information
Rosa Valletta: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
Roberto Rongo: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
Ada Carolina Pango Madariaga: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
Roberta Baiano: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
Gianrico Spagnuolo: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
Vincenzo D’Antò: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 9, 1-10

Abstract: An accurate estimation of both facial growth and the dentoalveolar dimension is key to successful treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between the Condylion–Gonion–Menton angle (CoGoMe^) and dentoalveolar heights in a population of patients from southern Italy. This retrospective study analyzed 270 cephalograms of 115 males (42.1%, mean age 15.5 ± 5.2 years) and 155 females (57.9%, mean age 15.6 ± 5.9 years). The facial divergency was evaluated with the Sella–Nasion and Gonion–Gnation angle (SN^GoGn), mandibular structure with the CoGoMe^, and dentoalveolar heights were assessed in four measurements: upper anterior (UADH), lower anterior (LADH), upper posterior (UPDH), and lower posterior (LPDH). Data were analyzed by means of Pearson’s correlation and linear regression model ( p < 0.05). All the dentoalveolar heights were strongly correlated among them ( p < 0.001). The UADH was correlated with the SN^GoGn (r = 0.145; p = 0.017), while the LPDH was correlated with the CoGoMe^ (r = −0.183; p = 0.003). Moreover, there was a positive association between the UADH and the SN^GoGn (B = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.014–0.144; p = 0.017), and a negative association between the CoGoMe^ and the LPDH (B = −0.098; 95% CI: −0.161–0.035; p = 0.003). Facial divergency and mandibular structure are associated with dentoalveolar heights.

Keywords: dentoalveolar heights; mandibular divergency; facial growth; cephalometric analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3309/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3309/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3309-:d:355982

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3309-:d:355982