EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Biomechanical Characterization of the Turning Phase during a 180° Change of Direction

Enrico Santoro, Antonio Tessitore, Chiang Liu, Chi-Hsien Chen, Chutimon Khemtong, Mauro Mandorino, Yi-Hua Lee and Giancarlo Condello
Additional contact information
Enrico Santoro: Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135 Roma, Italy
Antonio Tessitore: Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135 Roma, Italy
Chiang Liu: Institute of Sports Equipment Technology, University of Taipei, 101 Zhongcheng Rd. Section 2, Shilin District, Taipei 111, Taiwan
Chi-Hsien Chen: Institute of Sports Equipment Technology, University of Taipei, 101 Zhongcheng Rd. Section 2, Shilin District, Taipei 111, Taiwan
Chutimon Khemtong: Graduate Institute of Sports Training, Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Taipei, 101 Zhongcheng Rd. Section 2, Shilin District, Taipei 111, Taiwan
Mauro Mandorino: Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135 Roma, Italy
Yi-Hua Lee: Department of Ball Sports, University of Taipei, 101 Zhongcheng Rd. Section 2, Shilin District, Taipei 111, Taiwan
Giancarlo Condello: Graduate Institute of Sports Training, Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Taipei, 101 Zhongcheng Rd. Section 2, Shilin District, Taipei 111, Taiwan

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 11, 1-16

Abstract: The aim of this study was to characterize the turning phase during a modified 505 test. Forty collegiate basketball students, divided into faster and slower performers and high-playing-level and low-playing-level groups, were evaluated for the force-time characteristics (braking and/or propulsive phase) of the penultimate foot contact (PFC), final foot contact (FFC), and first accelerating foot contact (AFC), and for completion time and approach velocity. Based on the composition of the AFC, trials were classified as braking/propulsive or only propulsive. Regression analysis for the prediction of completion time was performed. The AFC contributed to reacceleration through shorter contact times and step length, and lower braking force production ( p < 0.05). Faster performers and the high-playing-level group demonstrated ( p < 0.05): lower completion times, higher approach velocities, longer steps length in the PFC and FFC, greater braking forces and impulses in the PFC; greater braking and propulsive forces, braking impulses, lower contact times in the FFC; greater braking and propulsive horizontal forces, horizontal impulses, lower contact times and vertical impulses in the AFC. Kinetic variables from only the FFC and AFC and approach velocity predicted 75% (braking/propulsive trials) and 76.2% (only-propulsive trials) of completion times. The characterization of the turning phase demonstrated the specific contribution of each foot contact and the possible implications for training prescription.

Keywords: modified 505 test; kinetic variables; completion time; foot contact; predictors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5519/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5519/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5519-:d:559276

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5519-:d:559276