Influence of Forest Visitors’ Perceived Restorativeness on Social–Psychological Stress

Don-Gak Lee, Mi-Mi Lee, Young-Mi Jeong, Jin-Gun Kim, Yung-Kyoon Yoon and Won-Sop Shin
Additional contact information
Don-Gak Lee: Graduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Mi-Mi Lee: Graduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Young-Mi Jeong: Graduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Jin-Gun Kim: Graduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Yung-Kyoon Yoon: Department of Forest Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Won-Sop Shin: Department of Forest Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 12, 1-14

Abstract: This study was conducted to verify the perceived restorativeness of citizens visiting forests on social–psychological stress and psychological resilience according to forest space type. The study involved a questionnaire survey conducted on citizens who visited forests between 1 May and 15 July 2020, when social distancing in daily life was being implemented. Three types of forest spaces (urban forest, national park, and natural recreation forest) were selected for the survey. They used the survey results of 1196 people as analysis data for this study. In this study, the PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) and the PWI-SF (Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form) were used to evaluate perceived restorativeness and social–psychological stress of citizens visiting forests. In the study, the average score of visitors’ perceived restorativeness was 5.31 ± 0.77. Social–psychological stress was found in the healthy group, potential stress group, and high-risk group. These groups made up 8.0%, 82.5%, and 9.5% of the respondents, respectively. Pearson’s correlation analysis between perceived restorativeness and social–psychological stress revealed that the higher the perceived restorativeness, the lower the social–psychological stress. “Diversion Mood”, “Not bored”, and “Coherence”, which are the sub-factors of perceived restorativeness according to the forest space type, were found to have meaningful results for psychological resilience. However, there was no significant difference in the forest space type between “Compatibility” and social–psychological stress, which are sub-factors of perceived restorativeness. In conclusion, the forest space type affects the psychological resilience of those who visit the forest. Urban forests, national parks, and natural recreation forests are places to reduce stress.

Keywords: COVID-19; social–psychological stress; PWI-SF (Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form); ART (attention restoration theory); PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale); forest cultural and recreational resources (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6328/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6328/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6328-:d:573125

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().