Seasonal Variation in Generic and Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life in Rhinologic Patients in Southern Finland

Maija Ylivuori, Reija Ruuhela, Harri Sintonen, Paula Virkkula, Risto P. Roine and Maija Hytönen
Additional contact information
Maija Ylivuori: Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11–13, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
Reija Ruuhela: Weather and Climate Change Impact Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00560 Helsinki, Finland
Harri Sintonen: Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Paula Virkkula: Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11–13, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
Risto P. Roine: Group Administration, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
Maija Hytönen: Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11–13, 00029 Helsinki, Finland

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 12, 1-8

Abstract: Background: Seasonal variation in exacerbations, hospitalisations, and mortality statistics has been reported for some diseases. To our knowledge, however, no published studies exist on the seasonality of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) amongst rhinologic patients. Aims/Objectives: This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the possible seasonal variation in rhinologic patients’ HRQoL using the rhinologic disease-specific Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the generic 15D HRQoL instrument. Material and Methods: We enrolled unselected adult rhinologic patients requiring specialist care at the Helsinki University Hospital in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based prospective study during four seasons: February (winter), May (spring), August (summer), and November (autumn). Patients received SNOT-22 and 15D questionnaires via post. The Finnish Meteorological Institute supplied climate data from these months. Results: SNOT-22 and 15D data were available for 301 and 298 patients, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences ( p = 0.948) between the mean monthly 15D scores or mean SNOT-22 scales. Furthermore, the mean SNOT-22 subscales did not differ between the monthly study periods. Conclusions and Significance: Our study shows that seasonality did not impact rhinologic patients’ SNOT-22 or 15D HRQoL scores. Thus, these questionnaires can be used for follow-up amongst rhinologic patients regardless of season.

Keywords: adult; climate; PROM; sinonasal; questionnaire; 15D; SNOT-22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6428/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6428/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6428-:d:574600

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().