“I Could Not Manage This Long-Term, Absolutely Not.” Aging in Place, Informal Care, COVID-19, and the Neighborhood in Flanders (Belgium)

Jakob D’herde, Wesley Gruijthuijsen, Dominique Vanneste, Veerle Draulans and Hilde Heynen
Additional contact information
Jakob D’herde: Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Wesley Gruijthuijsen: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Dominique Vanneste: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Veerle Draulans: Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Hilde Heynen: Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 12, 1-14

Abstract: Public health and care policies across OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries increasingly encourage aging in place, enabled by both formal care networks, and informal (family) care and social solidarity in the neighborhood. However, little is known about how a person’s neighborhood might affect their aging in place. The COVID-19 crisis unintendedly offered a good opportunity to observe the neighborhood’s role in the provision of care. Since formal care services were often limited during the lockdown, informal caregiving may have increased. However, intergenerational contacts in and outside of the household were strongly discouraged by governments worldwide, adding another layer of complexity to caregiving. The aim of this qualitative study was to assess how informal caregivers in Flanders managed to provide care to their care receivers, and what role the neighborhood played in this provision of care. Sixteen qualitative Skype and telephone interviews with informal caregivers were conducted between June and December 2020 to understand their experiences and coping strategies. Overall, most respondents increased their frequency of caregiving during the first lockdown. They took on the extra care needs during the lockdown themselves, and did not actively invoke any kind of neighborhood support. The significance of the neighborhood seemingly remained limited. This was often not because no help was offered, but rather due to a sense of pride or the fear of infection, and an increased effort by family caregivers.

Keywords: aging in place; informal care; COVID-19; neighborhood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6482/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6482/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6482-:d:575769

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().