Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Young Refugees: Comparison of Questionnaire Data with and without Involvement of an Interpreter

Lauritz Rudolf Floribert Müller, Johanna Unterhitzenberger, Svenja Wintersohl, Rita Rosner and Julia König
Additional contact information
Lauritz Rudolf Floribert Müller: Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
Johanna Unterhitzenberger: Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
Svenja Wintersohl: Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
Rita Rosner: Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
Julia König: Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 13, 1-7

Abstract: Background : The substantial number of young refugees who have arrived in Europe since 2015 requires rapid screening to identify those in need of treatment. However, translated versions of screening measures are not always available, necessitating the support of interpreters. The Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) is a validated questionnaire for posttraumatic stress symptoms. Here, we report on the psychometric properties of the CATS in a sample of young refugees as a function of interpreter involvement. Methods: A total of N = 145 ( M age = 16.8, SD = 1.54; 93% male) were assessed with the CATS, with half of the screenings conducted with and half without interpreters. Post hoc analyses included calculating internal consistency using Cronbach’s ? . We used confirmative factor analysis to investigate the factor structure. Results: The CATS total scale showed good reliability (? = 0.84). Differences in psychometric properties between the interpreter vs. the no interpreter group were minor and tended to be in favor of the interpreter group. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis were acceptable after the exclusion of items with low item-scale correlations. Conclusions: The sample and the administration of the assessment represent the situation of young refugees in Germany, where resources are low and translated versions not always available. The CATS may be a helpful screening tool for clinicians working with young refugees, even when administered with an interpreter. Limitations include the post hoc design of the analysis without randomization of participants and the lack of a third comparison group using translated questionnaire versions.

Keywords: refugee; adolescent; assessment; screening; PTSD; interpreter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6803/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6803/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6803-:d:581582

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().