Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal

Sushma Rajbanshi, Mohd Noor Norhayati and Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Additional contact information
Sushma Rajbanshi: Women’s Health Development Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia
Mohd Noor Norhayati: Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia
Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina: Women’s Health Development Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 13, 1-13

Abstract: Patient complaints and dissatisfaction should be taken seriously and used as an opportunity to provide acceptable services. Mounting evidence shows that the perception of the quality of healthcare services impacts health-seeking behaviors. This study explores the perceptions of good-quality antenatal and birthing services among postpartum women. A qualitative study using phenomenological inquiry was conducted in the Morang district, Nepal. The study participants were postpartum women with at least one high-risk factor who refused the referral hospital’s birth advice. A total of 14 women were purposively selected and interviewed in-depth. NVivo 12 Plus software was used for systematic coding, and thematic analysis was performed manually. Three themes emerged: (i) women’s opinions and satisfactory factors of health services, (ii) expectations of the health facility and staff, and (iii) a lack of suggestions to improve the quality of care. Women did not have many expectations from the healthcare facility or the healthcare providers and could not express what good quality of care meant for them. Women from low socioeconomic status and marginalized ethnicities lack knowledge of their basic reproductive rights. These women judge the quality of care in terms of staff interpersonal behavior and personal experiences. Women will not demand quality services if they lack an understanding of their basic health rights.

Keywords: quality of care; users’ perspectives; good antenatal care; good birthing services; reproductive rights; patient-centered care; Nepal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6876/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6876/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6876-:d:582965

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().