Gait Flexibility among Older Persons Significantly More Impaired in Fallers Than Non-Fallers—A Longitudinal Study

Eva Ekvall Hansson, Elina Valkonen, Ulrika Olsson Möller, Yi Chen Lin, Måns Magnusson and Per-Anders Fransson
Additional contact information
Eva Ekvall Hansson: Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Elina Valkonen: Helsinki University Hospital, 00280 Helsinki, Finland
Ulrika Olsson Möller: Department of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, 29139 Kristianstad, Sweden
Yi Chen Lin: Alders Physiotherapy Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan
Måns Magnusson: Department of Clinical Sciences in Lund/ENT, Lund University, 22185 Lund, Sweden
Per-Anders Fransson: Department of Clinical Sciences in Lund/ENT, Lund University, 22185 Lund, Sweden

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 13, 1-13

Abstract: Gait disorders are a relevant factor for falls and possible to measure with wearable devices. If a wearable sensor can detect differences in gait parameters between fallers and non-fallers has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to measure and compare gait parameters, vestibular function, and balance performance between fallers and non-fallers among a group of older persons. Participants were senior members ( n = 101) of a Swedish non-profit gymnastic association. Gait parameters were obtained using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) that the participants wore on the leg while walking an obstacle course and on an even surface. Vestibular function was assessed by the Head-shake test, the Head impulse test, and the Dix–Hallpike maneuver. Balance was assessed by the Timed Up and Go, the Timed Up and Go manual, and the Timed Up and Go cognitive tests. Falls during the 12-month follow-up period were monitored using fall diaries. Forty-two persons (41%) had fallen during the 12-month follow-up. Fallers had more limited ability to vary their gait (gait flexibility) than non-fallers ( p < 0.001). No other differences between fallers and non-fallers were found. The use of gait flexibility, captured by an IMU, seems better for identifying future fallers among healthy older persons than Timed Up and Go or Timed Up and Go combined with a cognitive or manual task.

Keywords: balance; gait; falls; older people; postural balance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7074/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7074/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7074-:d:587238

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().