Conspiracy Theories, Psychological Distress, and Sympathy for Violent Radicalization in Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Anna Levinsson, Diana Miconi, Zhiyin Li, Rochelle L. Frounfelker and Cécile Rousseau
Additional contact information
Anna Levinsson: Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada
Diana Miconi: Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada
Zhiyin Li: Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave. W, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada
Rochelle L. Frounfelker: Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada
Cécile Rousseau: Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 15, 1-12

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread uncertainty, promoted psychological distress, and fueled interpersonal conflict. The concomitant upsurge in endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories is worrisome because they are associated with both non-adherence to public health guidelines and intention to commit violence. This study investigates associations between endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories, support for violent radicalization (VR) and psychological distress among young adults in Canada. We hypothesized that (a) endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories is positively associated with support for VR, and (b) psychological distress modifies the relationship between COVID-19 conspiracy theories and support for VR. A total of 6003 participants aged 18–35 years old residing in four major Canadian cities completed an online survey between 16 October 2020 and 17 November 2020, that included questions about endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories, support for VR, psychological distress, and socio-economic status. Endorsement of conspiracy theories was associated with support for VR in multivariate regression (? = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80–0.96). There is a significant interaction effect between endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and psychological distress (? = 0.49, 95% CI 0.40–0.57). The magnitude of the association was stronger in individuals reporting high psychological distress (? = 1.36, 95% CI 1.26–1.46) compared to those reporting low psychological distress (? = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35–0.59). The association between endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and VR represents a public health challenge requiring immediate attention. The interaction with psychological distress suggests that policy efforts should combine communication and psychological strategies to mitigate the legitimation of violence.

Keywords: COVID-19 conspiracy theories; psychological distress; violent radicalization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7846/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7846/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7846-:d:600761

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().