EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fate of Benzophenone, Benzophenone-3 and Caffeine in Lab-Scale Direct River Water Treatment by Hybrid Processes

Minja Bogunović, Tijana Marjanović and Ivana Ivančev-Tumbas
Additional contact information
Minja Bogunović: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Novi Sad, Trg. Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Tijana Marjanović: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Novi Sad, Trg. Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Ivana Ivančev-Tumbas: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Novi Sad, Trg. Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 16, 1-17

Abstract: Emerging microcontaminants benzophenone (BP), benzophenone-3 (BP-3) and caffeine (CF) are widely used anthropogenic markers from a group of pharmaceuticals and personal care products. They have different logD values and charges at neutral pH (2.96 neutral for BP; 3.65 negative and neutral for BP-3; 0.28 and neutral for CF). The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation (C/F/S), adsorption onto two types of powdered activated carbon (PAC)/sedimentation (PAC/S) and the combination of these two processes in different dosing sequences (PAC/C/F/S) and with/without ultrafiltration (powdered activated carbon/ultrafiltration—PAC/UF, coagulation/UF—CoA/UF) for the removal of selected micropollutants from river water. It was shown that the removal efficiency of benzophenones by coagulation depends on the season, while CF was moderately removed (40–70%). The removal of neutral BP by two PACs unexpectedly differed (near 40% and ?93%), while the removal of BP-3 was excellent (>95%). PACs were not efficient for the removal of hydrophilic CF. Combined PAC/C/F/S yielded excellent removal for BP and BP-3 regardless of PAC type only when the PAC addition was followed by C/F/S, while C/F/S efficiency for CF diminished. The combination of UF with PAC or coagulant showed also high efficacy for benzophenones, but was negligible for CF removal.

Keywords: drinking water treatments; emerging contaminants; ultrafiltration; activated carbon; coagulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8691/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8691/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8691-:d:616073

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8691-:d:616073