EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas

Tufail Ahmed, Mehdi Moeinaddini, Meshal Almoshaogeh, Arshad Jamal, Imran Nawaz and Fawaz Alharbi
Additional contact information
Tufail Ahmed: UHasselt, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Mehdi Moeinaddini: Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
Meshal Almoshaogeh: Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
Arshad Jamal: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Design and Built Environment, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
Imran Nawaz: UHasselt, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Fawaz Alharbi: Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 16, 1-18

Abstract: Crosswalks are critical locations in the urban transport network that need to be designed carefully as pedestrians are directly exposed to vehicular traffic. Although various methods are available to evaluate the level of service (LOS) at pedestrian crossings, pedestrian crossing facilities are frequently ignored in assessing crosswalk conditions. This study attempts to provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating crosswalks based on several essential indicators adopted from different guidelines. A new pedestrian crossing level of service (PCLOS) method is introduced in this research, with an aimto promote safe and sustainable operations at such locations. The new PCLOS employs an analytical point system to compare existing street crossing conditions to the guidelines’ standards, taking into account the scores and coefficients of the indicators. The quantitative scores and coefficients of indicators are assigned based on field observations and respondent opinions. The method was tested to evaluate four pedestrian crosswalks in the city of Putrajaya, Malaysia. A total of 17 indicators were selected for the study after a comprehensive literature review. Survey results show that the provision of a zebra crossing was the most critical indicator at the pedestrian crossings, while drainage near crosswalks was regarded as the least important. Four indicators had a coefficient value above 4, indicating that these are very critical pedestrian crossing facilities and significantly impact the calculation of LOS for pedestrian crossings. Four crosswalks were evaluated using the proposed method in Putrajaya, Malaysia. The crosswalk at the Ministry of Domestic Trade Putrajaya got the “PCLOS A”. In contrast, the midblock crossing in front of the Putrajaya Corporation was graded “PCLOS C”. While the remaining two crosswalks were graded as “PCLOS B” crosswalks. Based on the assigned PCLOS grade, the proposed method could also assist in identifying current design and operation issues in existing pedestrian crossings and providing sound policy recommendations for improvements to ensure pedestrian safety.

Keywords: active mobility; walking; urban crosswalk evaluation; crossing indicators; pedestrian safety; public health; level of service analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8813/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8813/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8813-:d:618759

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8813-:d:618759